Login




Emodialisi

EFFECTS OF TWO DIFFERENT REGIONAL CITRATE ANTICOAGULATION CVVH PROTOCOLS ON ACID-BASE STATUS AND PHOSPHATE SUPPLEMENTATION.

Questo Abstract è stato accettato come Poster.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION. Regional citrate anticoagulation (RCA) is now considered the preferred anticoagulation protocol in high bleeding risk patients and different combination of citrate and CRRT solutions can affect acid-base balance. Regardless of the anticoagulation protocol, hypophosphatemia occurs frequently in CRRT. In this case report, we evaluated safety and effects on acid-base status of a new RCA-CVVH protocol using a 18 mmol/L citrate solution combined with a phosphate-containing replacement fluid, compared with a 12 mmol/L RCA-CVVH protocol with conventional replacement solution.

METHODS. Until september 2011, RCA-CVVH was routinely performed in our center with a 12 mmol/L citrate solution (Prismocitrate 10/2) and a post-dilution replacement fluid with bicarbonate (Prismasol 2; HCO3- 32, Ca++ 1.75, Mg++ 0.5, K+ 2 mmol/L) (protocol A). In case of persistent acidosis, not related to citrate accumulation, bicarbonate infusion was scheduled. In order to optimize buffers balance, a new RCA-CVVH protocol has been designed using recently introduced solutions: 18 mmol/L citrate solution (Prismocitrate 18), phosphate-containing post-dilution replacement fluid with bicarbonate (Phoxilium; HCO3- 30, Phoshate 1.2, Ca++ 1.25, Mg++ 0.6, K+ 4 mmol/L) (protocol B).

RESULTS. In a cardiac surgery patient with AKI, acid-base status and electrolytes have been evaluated comparing protocol A (5 circuits, 301 hours) vs protocol B (2 circuits, 97 hours): pH 7.39±0.03 vs 7.44±0.03 (p<0.0001), bicarbonate 22.3±1.8 vs 22.6±1.4 mmol/L (NS), BE -2.8±2.1 vs -1.6±1.2 (p=0.007), phosphate 0.85±0.2 vs 1.3±0.5 mmol/L (p=0.027). Protocol A required bicarbonate and sodium phosphate infusion (8.9±2.8 mmol/h and 5g/day, respectively) while protocol B allowed to stop both supplementations. Furthermore, the need for KCl infusion was significantly lower with protocol B (4±0.2 vs 1.4±1.5 mmol/h; p<0.0001).

CONCLUSIONS. In this preliminary, single patient report, protocol B provided a buffers balance more positive than protocol A and allowed to adequately control acid-base status without additional bicarbonate infusion and in absence of alkalosis, despite the use of a standard bicarbonate concentration replacement solution. Furthermore, the combination of a phosphate-containing replacement fluid appeared effective to prevent hypophosphatemia.

S. Morabito(1), V. Pistolesi(1), L. Tritapepe(1), E. Vitaliano(2), L. Zeppilli(1), F. Polistena(1), E. Strampelli(1), M.I. Sacco(1), A. Pierucci(1)
((1)Umberto I, Policlinico Di Roma, Sapienza, Università Di Roma , (2)Ospedale Sandro Pertini Roma )
Non sono presenti commenti
Figure
Realizzazione: Tesi S.p.A.

Per assistenza contattare: Claudia Ingrassia, Tesi S.p.A.
0172 476301 — claudia.ingrassia@gruppotesi.com